Author: aztec8888

Back in the day, when free speech was much more available, one had to tediously study the information to discover the truth. If you were not a critical thinker with lots of time on your hands, trying to locate a truthful bit of information was literally like searching for a needle in a haystack.

Now, most do not have the time or mindset to read, let alone research anything. I blame that on the educational system. I taught for 27 years and the rule when drafting lesson plans was that the timing for each lesson had to be no more than 15 minutes. Some study somewhere had determined that children could not hold their attention for more than 15 minutes.

My experience told me that it could not be true. I remember, as a small child, sitting for hours observing anthills or the birds in trees. My son and daughter sat watching the entire comedy The Party with Peter Sellers – it was over an hour, they got all the jokes, and they were only three years old. So, I began lengthening the time of my lessons. Something amazing began to happen. My students became much more engaged in whatever the subject was. I had them reading silently books of their choice for an hour. My students would be so engrossed in their reading or their projects that I had to remind them about lunch or recess times.

The educational system programmed students to have short attention spans.

With the increase in the use of the Internet, smartphones, and tablets, there is a dramatic increase in available information. We can access information rapidly. There is less control over what is available to read and view. I believe that is why there is an increase in censorship and manipulation of information to relay a specific narrative.

The headlines rarely describe the main idea of the article; they are used to frame the point of view that fits the official narrative. So, I learned to ignore headlines entirely. People with limited attention span do not want to wade through several paragraphs, so truthful information is found either in the middle or last paragraph. I noticed this, and I began to read articles from the bottom up.

If someone writes something different from the official narrative, they must be silenced and discredited. I began to research people who were being discredited. Wikipedia is great for discovering people with the most truth, they are the people most vilified.

So, instead of having to search through a lot of information for truth, you can now find it easily and with little effort.

Look for information that is being repressed, censored, deleted, or discredited.

https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/is-the-covid19-vaccine-safe

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html

Listen to people who were renowned and respected, but because they have voiced some idea or information that goes against what the official narrative is, they are discredited, removed, and/or charged with some offense (usually sexual).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange

https://www.aol.com/tucker-carlson-longtime-producer-accused-132828872.html

Always view and read information with a critical mindset. Ask yourself who the information is really for and who it really serves.

There are very wrong ways to mitigate climate alteration. Some have latched on to these methods as a way to deny that the alteration of our global climate is a problem.
Here in this thread, you have links to recent news from around the world, links to scientific organizations and climatologists, and links to resources to check information for yourself.
I believe that most of us now have experienced unusual and extreme variations in our weather patterns, higher prices for energy and food, and the growing difficulty of obtaining home insurance in some regions.
I propose that the base problem facing the world is corporations/governments need to place total control on populations: control of our movement, water, food, health, and reproduction. None of this is hidden, you can actually find the plans laid out on the World Economic Forum´s website: https://www.weforum.org/
WHO: https://www.who.int/news/item/20-09-2023-who-welcomes-historic-commitment-by-world-leaders-for-greater-collaboration–governance-and-investment-to-prevent–prepare-for-and-respond-to-future-pandemics
The United Nations: https://sdgs.un.org/goals
When I read this information I see an unelected global governance that is focused on shepherding populations into cities where we will be surveilled and controlled. This has nothing to do with helping regions to mitigate the pollution brought on by underregulated corporations. This has nothing to do with helping people prepare for floods, extreme heat, the extreme cold, the rebuilding and reinforcement of outdated infrastructure, and the repair of broken distribution routes for food, water, energy, goods, and services.
All of a sudden climate alteration has to do with LBGQT***, centralized digital currency, 15-minute cities, bans on travel, bans on free speech, mandated health procedures, and lockdowns for pandemics which we are constantly warned will happen.
Don´t be misled. It is an example of Occam’s Razor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
Aristotle writes in his Posterior Analytics, “We may assume the superiority ceteris paribus [other things being equal] of the demonstration which derives from fewer postulates or hypotheses.” Ptolemy (c. AD 90 – c. 168) stated, “We consider it a good principle to explain the phenomena by the simplest hypothesis possible.”[12]
I say follow the money and power and you will always find your answer. The energy, financial, pharmaceutical, and agricultural corporations have infiltrated our regulatory agencies. Our governments no longer even pretend to work for us, the people. The alteration of the climate is a measurable problem and whether it is human-caused or a natural phenomenon is not even an argument at this point (sort of like standing around arguing if the fire that is burning up your house is caused by your 5-year-old playing with matches or a lightening bolt) the fact is mitigating it is going to upset the bottom line for corporations. These corporations will face more regulations, they will have to clean up what they pollute.
It is much easier to reduce and control the population.
Use fear. Use coercion. Use isolation. Use reduction in freedoms and rights.
AND make people think that climate alteration is the hoax that is causing these things.
Pay attention, and think critically. Nothing is being proposed that regulates the corporations that are the major source of pollution of our water, air, and soil.
And what about the forever wars?

This video really makes a statement: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4u3q83MTuVg

Reposted from my September 27th post in Internations.org.